The canonical topology on a category #
We define the finest (largest) Grothendieck topology for which a given presheaf P
is a sheaf.
This is well defined since if P
is a sheaf for a topology J
, then it is a sheaf for any
coarser (smaller) topology. Nonetheless we define the topology explicitly by specifying its sieves:
A sieve S
on X
is covering for finestTopologySingle P
iff
for any f : Y ⟶ X
, P
satisfies the sheaf axiom for S.pullback f
.
Showing that this is a genuine Grothendieck topology (namely that it satisfies the transitivity
axiom) forms the bulk of this file.
This generalises to a set of presheaves, giving the topology finestTopology Ps
which is the
finest topology for which every presheaf in Ps
is a sheaf.
Using Ps
as the set of representable presheaves defines the canonicalTopology
: the finest
topology for which every representable is a sheaf.
A Grothendieck topology is called Subcanonical
if it is smaller than the canonical topology,
equivalently it is subcanonical iff every representable presheaf is a sheaf.
References #
- https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/canonical+topology
- https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/subcanonical+coverage
- https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00Z9
- https://math.stackexchange.com/a/358709/
To show P
is a sheaf for the binding of U
with B
, it suffices to show that P
is a sheaf for
U
, that P
is a sheaf for each sieve in B
, and that it is separated for any pullback of any
sieve in B
.
This is mostly an auxiliary lemma to show isSheafFor_trans
.
Adapted from [Elephant], Lemma C2.1.7(i) with suggestions as mentioned in
https://math.stackexchange.com/a/358709/
Given two sieves R
and S
, to show that P
is a sheaf for S
, we can show:
P
is a sheaf forR
P
is a sheaf for the pullback ofS
along any arrow inR
P
is separated for the pullback ofR
along any arrow inS
.
This is mostly an auxiliary lemma to construct finestTopology
.
Adapted from [Elephant], Lemma C2.1.7(ii) with suggestions as mentioned in
https://math.stackexchange.com/a/358709
Construct the finest (largest) Grothendieck topology for which the given presheaf is a sheaf.
This is a special case of https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00Z9, but following a different proof (see the comments there).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Construct the finest (largest) Grothendieck topology for which all the given presheaves are sheaves.
This is equal to the construction of
Equations
- CategoryTheory.Sheaf.finestTopology Ps = sInf (CategoryTheory.Sheaf.finestTopologySingle '' Ps)
Instances For
Check that if P ∈ Ps
, then P
is indeed a sheaf for the finest topology on Ps
.
Check that if each P ∈ Ps
is a sheaf for J
, then J
is a subtopology of finestTopology Ps
.
The canonicalTopology
on a category is the finest (largest) topology for which every
representable presheaf is a sheaf.
See
Equations
- CategoryTheory.Sheaf.canonicalTopology C = CategoryTheory.Sheaf.finestTopology (Set.range CategoryTheory.yoneda.toPrefunctor.obj)
Instances For
yoneda.obj X
is a sheaf for the canonical topology.
A representable functor is a sheaf for the canonical topology.
A subcanonical topology is a topology which is smaller than the canonical topology. Equivalently, a topology is subcanonical iff every representable is a sheaf.
Equations
Instances For
If every functor yoneda.obj X
is a J
-sheaf, then J
is subcanonical.
If J
is subcanonical, then any representable is a J
-sheaf.